Steinbeck uses lots
of different methods to create tension and suspense between the men as they
wait for the sound of the shot.
At the
beginning of this extract, Carlson enters the bunk house and then makes the
first comment about Candy’s dog, saying that Candy has to ‘get him outta here’
because there’s ‘nothing that stinks as bad as an old dog’ Candy is apologetic
and Carlson continues to insult the old dog whilst the reader empathises
towards Candy and the dog for being attacked like this. Candy tries to explain
that he’s had him so long and he ‘never noticed how he stinks’ but Carlson is
relentless in his argument and he brings forth the option of having the dog
shot for the first time.
The preposition
of the dogs’ death makes Candy feel uncomfortable and although he tries to put
up a fight against the idea of the dogs death, he is immediately shut down again
by Carlson, who tries to get Candy to see his point of view by saying that the
dog ‘suffers hisself all the time’ and at this point, Carlson actually
physically shows Candy where he would shoot the dog so that Candy is assured
that it would suffer no pain. When Candy next speaks, Steinbeck uses the word
‘softly’ as an adjective to describe the way he explains that he has ‘had ‘im
too long’ and he’s ‘so used to him’ as if to suggest that he knows he will not
win the argument and his actions betray his nervousness about the situation.
Carlson
continues trying to persuade Candy to agree with him by saying that he ‘ain’t
bein’ kind keepin’ him alive,’ and even offers him one of Slim’s pups as a
replacement. At this point, Slim joins the argument, taking a much more relaxed
approach, but backs Carlson’s idea of killing the dog. Steinbeck writes how
‘Slim’s opinions were law’ which shows how much authority Slim must have over
the men, causing Candy to look helplessly around and feebly try to state his
argument once more, knowing for sure now, that the argument was lost. He tries
to gain sympathy from the other men by voicing his worry that shooting the dog
might cause it pain, but Carlson once again assures him that ‘the way he’d
shoot him, he wouldn’t feel nothing’. This makes Candy feel even more helpless.
Before the
argument can continue, a new character, Whit, is introduced and this brings a
sense of relief into the situation as the subject is changed from that of
Candy’s dog to the magazine in his hand and as Whit makes Slim read something
aloud from the magazine, it takes both Slim and Candy’s mind away from the
debate.
After Slim had read
the extract from the magazine, and after some slight confusion, Whit brought
their attention to the author of the extract and Steinbeck writes that ‘Whit did
not surrender his hold on it’ indicating that he is holding onto the memory of
the person as if he usually does not have many good memories.
As the
conversation about the magazine dies out, Carlson, who ‘had refused to be drawn
in’ by this story had been noticed by Candy as he was watching Carlson
‘uneasily’ giving the impression that he was reluctant to start up the argument
again, however, Carlson does, by suggesting that he shoots the dog again. After
a few more unsuccessful attempts at arguing back, Candy finally says ‘‘Awright
– take ‘im.’ Steinbeck writes this sentence cleverly, in my opinion, because
the careful use of punctuation allows the reader to hear Candy saying it with
reluctance and bitterness at finally being defeated. As soon as he says this the
tension starts to build as he lies down on his bed, facing the ceiling in
silence.
As Carlson
takes the dog, you can feel that the atmosphere has changed between the men as
Carlson is suddenly ‘apologetic’ and promising that the dog ‘won’t even feel
it’ as if trying to console Candy, even though he was the one to upset him. Candy
remains silent as the dog is lead from the room, and although it is not
written, this silence expresses Candy’s emotion perfectly. To make the situation
worse, Slim reminds Carlson to ‘take a shovel’ making the situation more
realistic. At these words, the tension is thickened as Carlson leaves the room.
Steinbeck then
goes on to personify the silence by saying it ‘came into the room and lasted’. George tries to change the subject to Lennie
and his new pup and, trying to consolidate Candy, Slim once again offers Candy
a new pup. Again, Candy remains silent and the other men ‘trail off’ as if they
knew that no one was actually listening. This time, Steinbeck writes that ‘the
silence came out of the night and invaded the room’ which describes the silence
as something evil and unwanted. George, trying to break this new, denser
silence suggests they ‘play a little euchre’ and although Whit agrees to this
suggestion, they never get around to playing, as it is apparent that they are
all waiting for the sound of the shot.
After a while a
small gnawing sound can be heard from under the floor and it is written that
they ‘looked down towards it gratefully.’
I think Steinbeck has used the word ‘gratefully’ because it was an excuse to
take their mind away from the ‘invading’ silence, thick tension and awkward
atmosphere. Just then, Whit remembered that they were supposed to be playing
euchre and he reveals his edginess by saying ‘What the hell’s takin’ him so
long? Lay out some cards, why don’t you?’ This outburst shows that his nerves
are on edge and he cannot take the tension much longer, so he wants to do
something to take his mind off of the situation.
Finally, after what seems an age of silence, there
is a shot in the distance and, as if they are all expecting a reaction from
Candy, their heads turn in unison to face him, but all Candy does it turn to
face the wall, still in silence. Although Candy does not say anything, his
action symbolizes the sadness he feels about losing his only companion, as the
old dog was all he had left in the world and as Candy faces the wall, the
tension in the room breaks and everyone returns to normality, although the
reader feels sympathy towards Candy as he is now alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment